Legal Opinion

State v. Silva

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 24, 2001No. 45355-6-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Matthew G. Silva appeals his conviction for forgery, theft, and possession of stolen property on the *538grounds that he did not validly waive assistance of counsel. Because he was not advised of the maximum penalty for the crimes with which he was charged, we agree and reverse.

I

Matthew Silva was charged on amended information with two counts of forgery, two counts of second degree theft, and one count of possession of stolen property. Early in the proceedings, he moved to disqualify his appointed counsel and the entire public defender’s office with whom she was associated. He alleged a conflict…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Daniel Eugene Frazer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. City of Bellevue v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. ReadWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. LillardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. State v. LillardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. State v. MehrabianCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API