Legal Opinion

In re Nash

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1863PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certiorari to review discharge upon habeas corpus. The prisoner, Louisa Nash, had been arrested and committed on a charge of larceny; and on habeas corpus issued by the city judge, she had been discharged by that magistrate from imprisonment.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.*—Clerks, J.

The act of 1850 (Laws of 1850, 388, § 3), creating the office of city judge in the city and county of New York, confers upon this officer all judicial powers vested by law in the recorder of the city of New York; “ and,” it proceeds to say, “the said city judge shall, concurrently with said recorder, perform and discharge all j udieial duties imposed upon said recorder.” I will not now inquire whether this act confers upon the city judge any other judicial-powers than those belonging to the Court of General and Special Sessions, such as the power to hold a Court of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yates v. LansingNew York Supreme Court · 1810

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Enoch Morgan's Sons' Co. v. SchwachhoferNew York Supreme Court · 1878
  2. People ex rel. Smith v. RusselNew York Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Parrott v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.The Superior Court of New York City · 1869
  4. People ex rel. Ryan v. RusselNew York Supreme Court · 1866

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API