Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Manca

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided October 2, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LoConto J.

This is a report of a case in accordance with G.L.c. 218, §23. The essential facts of the case are not in dispute and were stipulated by the parties. The action involves nine separate small claims actions against the City of Gardner and its mayor, Charles Manca, by nine individual police officers seeking damages representing two days’ pay that had been deducted from their regular weekly salaries. The parties have stipulated, in part, to the following:

That at all times pertinent hereto, the plaintiffs were employed as permanent full time police officers for the Gardner Police…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Spencer v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
  3. Keel v. Cambridge Housing AuthorityMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Hanley v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API