Legal Opinion

Dolores D. San Nicolas, Augustin B. Duenas and Rosita D. Duenas v. Frankie S. Lizama, by Antonio P. Delgado, His Guardian Ad Litem

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 23, 1966No. 19936_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

ELY, Circuit Judge:

Appellants seek reversal of a judgment in which the appellee was awarded damages for personal injuries. The appellants are the two owners of an automobile and its operator. All of them maintain that the evidence was insufficient to support a judgment against them. The contention has no merit.

The suit arose from a collision between an automobile and a motorcycle at a highway intersection in the Territory of Guam. The automobile, owned by Augustin and Rosita Dueñas, was being operated by Dolores San Nicolas, and the motorcycle was being driven by the injured appellee. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Flores v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Leming v. Oilfields Trucking Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Wilcox v. BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Stober v. HalseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API