Legal Opinion
Head & Engquist Equipment, L.L.C. v. Penelore Corp.
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Decided February 3, 2004No. 2003-CA-00027-COAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIDGES, J.,
for the court.
¶ 1. Head & Engquist Equipment, LLC (“Head”), filed suit against Penelore Corporation (“Penelore”), in the 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, Louisiana. In its suit it sought to recover unpaid rental charges owed by Penelore on the rental of excavation equipment. Penelore never appeared nor responded to the pleadings filed in Louisiana; therefore, Head soon received a default judgement against Penelore. Head then registered its judgment in the County Court of Lowndes County, Mississippi, in an attempt to collect. Penelore filed a motion with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Eagle Green Energy, Inc. v. Forsite Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
- Marlin Business Bank v. Stevens Auction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017