Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Village of Clear Lake

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

The plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction and damages. An injunction had previously issued. It was not challenged by appeal. If the previous injunction is a permanent one, then manifestly it was in force when the present injunction was sought.

This court has heretofore held that a permanent injunction may be issued where a nuisance of the type as here, is found to exist. Briggson v. Viroqua (1953), 264 Wis. 47, 58 N. W. (2d) 546. In its judgment in the original action directing an abatement of the nuisance, the language employed by the court is substantially the same as that in Briggson v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parish v. Awschu Properties, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Kamke v. ClarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Behnisch v. Cedarburg Dairy Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Briggson v. City of ViroquaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Costas v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API