Legal Opinion
Tucker v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 2, 1989No. 88-1657PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
547 So.2d 270 (1989)
Ronald TUCKER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-1657.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
August 2, 1989.
John Lipinski, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
LETTS, Judge.
This cause is per curiam affirmed. However, one issue troubles us.
The question once more presented, as it was in Ringemann v. State, 546 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), and which we now certify as being of great public importance, is:
CAN A DEFENDANT, REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, ORALLY…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dumas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Enrique v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Dumas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Ringemann v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Zinnerman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996