Legal Opinion

People v. District Court In & For the City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 5, 1987No. 87SA166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOLLACK, Justice.

The People seek relief in the nature of prohibition under C.A.R. 21, to prevent the district court from releasing records of the Denver Department of Social Services [hereinafter DSS] concerning a child named as a victim in the underlying prosecution of the defendant, Anthony Santistevan, for sexual assault on a child. We issued an order to, show cause why defense counsel should not be prohibited from examining the records, and now make the rule absolute.

I

The defendant was charged by information with sexual assault on a child pursuant to section 18-3-405, 8B C.R.S. (1986).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Cheatwood v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. People v. OwensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. People v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  5. Judkins v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Larry W. Exline v. Frank O. Gunter, Executive Director, Colorado Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. People v. DISTRICT COURT FOR DENVERSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API