Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Costo

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1984No. Civ. 22926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FIELDS, J. *

Appellant Bill Costo appeals from an order of the superior court which held that respondent Ruth Costo, his former spouse, is entitled to a 46 percent share of his Air Force gross monthly retirement pay, including that portion which is a Veterans Administration disability benefit, and determining that he is in arrears in the amount of $6,732.26 as of November 2, 1982. Appellant contends that the portion of his total “retirement” pay which is considered a disability benefit is not subject to community property division. We agree and shall reverse the order of the trial court.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re Marriage of StenquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re Marriage of CullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. In Re Marriage of StenquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of KonzenWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Casas v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Davis v. DavisKentucky Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re Marriage of KuzmiakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Marriage of Strong v. StrongMontana Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API