In Re Marriage of Costo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FIELDS, J. *
Appellant Bill Costo appeals from an order of the superior court which held that respondent Ruth Costo, his former spouse, is entitled to a 46 percent share of his Air Force gross monthly retirement pay, including that portion which is a Veterans Administration disability benefit, and determining that he is in arrears in the amount of $6,732.26 as of November 2, 1982. Appellant contends that the portion of his total “retirement” pay which is considered a disability benefit is not subject to community property division. We agree and shall reverse the order of the trial court.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re Marriage of StenquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Marriage of CullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- In Re Marriage of StenquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of KonzenWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Casas v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Davis v. DavisKentucky Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Marriage of KuzmiakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Marriage of Strong v. StrongMontana Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.