Legal Opinion

Bank Mutual v. S.J. Boyer Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 23, 2008No. 2008AP912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunner, J.

¶ 1. Steven and Marcy Boyer appeal an order denying their motions for relief from judgments rendered against them in a foreclosure action. The Boyers were guarantors of debts owed by S.J. Boyer Construction, Inc., to Bank Mutual. The guaranteed debts were secured by mortgages on the foreclosed-upon properties. The Boyers contend Bank Mutual was prohibited from obtaining judgments against the Boyers for the full amounts of the debts because Bank Mutual elected a shortened redemption under Wis. Stat. § 846.103(2). We agree and reverse the order. We remand for the court to reconsider the Boyers'…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State ex rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Palmeter v. CareyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Zehetner v. CHRYSLER FINANCIAL CO., LLC.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bank Mutual v. S.J. Boyer Construction, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Bank Mutual v. S.J. Boyer Construction, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Bank Mutual v. S.J. Boyer Construction, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API