People v. Klem
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree. There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove ownership and value of the stolen vehicle. The record reveals that the vehicle was stolen from a lessee who had a superior right to possession (see, Penal Law § 155.00 [5]; People v Hutchinson, 56 NY2d 868) and that the original price for the vehicle was at least $22,000, the vehicle had been used for only a month and a half and was in excellent physical condition when…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. LiptonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. HutchinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993