Legal Opinion
Renaissance Park v. Davila
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided August 31, 2000No. 03-00-00127-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEE YEAKEL, Justice.
In this restricted appeal, 1 we review a no-answer default judgment rendered in favor of appellee Dora Davila against appellants Renaissance Park and Renaissance Park Apartments in the amount of $1,222,400. 2 Davila asserts that Renaissance was properly served with citation pursuant to section 92.003 of the Texas Property Code. 3 Renaissance complains that service was improper and that the pleadings and proof do not support the judgment. Because we agree that service was improper, we will reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
Davila’s pleadings allege that in 1997 and 1998 she…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Primate Construction, Inc. v. SilverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- McKanna v. EdgarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- TAC Americas, Inc. v. Boothe, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Walker v. City of Georgetown, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- in the Interest of T.T.F., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
- City of Roanoke v. Town of WestlakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Griesing, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.