Legal Opinion

Robert L. Phinney v. Tuboscope Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 24, 1959No. 17376_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

268 F.2d 233

59-2 USTC P 9541

Robert L. PHINNEY, Appellant,

v.

TUBOSCOPE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 17376.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 25, 1959, Rehearing Denied July 24, 1959.

George W. Beatty, Melva M. Graney, Lee A. Jackson, Dept. of Justice Washington, D.C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Russell B. Wine, U.S. Atty., John E. Banks, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for appellant.

C. W. Wellen, M.S. McCorquodale, Charles W. Hall, Houston, Tax., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates & Jaworski, Houston, Tex., for appellee.

Before CAMERON, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

JOHN…

Also in this document: Dissent; Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kanawha Gas & Utilities Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  2. Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Burford-Toothaker Tractor Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Robert L. Phinney v. Tuboscope CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Steuben Sec. Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API