Sauter v. Anderson
Appellate Court of Illinois
Trespass on the Case, under the Dram-shop act. Error to the Circuit Court of Knox County; the Hon. George W. Thompson, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1903.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Brown
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an action on the case by defendant in error against plaintiffs in error under the provision of that portion of section 9 of the Dram-shop act which declares that “every husband, wife, * * * or other person who shall be injured in person or property or means of support by any intoxicated person, shall have a right of action * * * against any person * * * who shall, by -selling or giving intoxicating liquors, have caused the intoxication.” The declaration charges that plaintiffs in error Sauter and Hoffheimer were each…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HinesIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. ThenIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Shreffler v. NadelhofferIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Western Stone Co. v. WhalenIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Gerke v. FancherIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sauter v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
- Cowen v. Story & Clark Piano Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
- Peterson v. Chicago & Oak Park Elevated RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913