Legal Opinion

Isbrandtsen Co. v. National Marine Engineers' Beneficial Ass'n

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 20, 1949PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYAN, District Judge.

Defendant moves under Rule 12(b) (2) and (5) Federal Rules Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to vacate and set aside service of the summons and complaint. It contends that the court has no jurisdiction over the person of the defendant because, (1) under Section 13 of the New York General Association Law, defendant union is not suable in its common name and that service of process can be made only upon its president or treasurer; and (2) service upon the assistant business manager of a local union does not constitute service upon the national association.

Plaintiff, a New York…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Wilson & Co. v. United Packinghouse WorkersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  3. Daily Review Corp. v. International Typographical UnionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1949

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, and Hugh L. Rutledge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  2. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 959 v. KingAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  4. Claycraft Co. v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  5. Hoyle v. United Auto Workers Local Union 5285District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API