Legal Opinion

Diuguid v. Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1935No. Appeal, 94PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The plaintiff in this action of assumpsit, a painting contractor, sued to recover the sum of $228, with interest, for work done and materials furnished in re-plastering and painting the basement of the church building of the defendant, under an alleged oral contract with certain of its trustees. The parties agree that they had a prior written contract for painting and decorating certain parts of the building for a consideration of $1,860, which amount has been paid. As to that there is no dispute. Plaintiff, however, contended that while work under the written…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reifsnyder v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Katz v. KatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Long v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Davidsville First National Bank v. St. John's ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Paper Mill Supply Co. v. Container Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ebasco Services Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Ebasco Services, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. W. C. Downey & Co. v. Kraemer Hosiery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Shapiro v. Capital Bakers, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Hartley v. United Mine Workers, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Greene County1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API