Legal Opinion

Quaintance v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 12, 1911No. 497PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7105 (T. D..30968).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

Certain figured cotton cloth containing other than ordinary warp and filling threads was assessed for duty at 25 per cent, 30 per cent, and 35 per cent ad valorem according to its value under the provisions of paragraphs 305 and 306 of the tariff act of July 24, 1897, and in addition 2 cents per square yard under the provisions of paragraph 313 of the same act.

Paragraphs 305 and 306 being typical of each other, one only is inserted-here.

306. Ootton cloth, not bleached, dyed, colored, stained, painted, or printed, exceeding one hundred and not exceeding one hundred and fifty threads to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Hedden v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Moore v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  4. United States v. VietorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. United States v. Rusch & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Yaedley & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. C. H. Powell Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API