Thompson v. State

PATTERSON, Judge.

The appellant challenges his judgment and sentence for grand theft. He argues that the trial court erred in failing to consider the factors in section 39.059(7)(c), Florida Statutes (1991), before determining whether to impose adult sanctions upon him. We agree.

On August 12, 1992, the state filed an information charging the appellant with burglary of a dwelling and grand theft on May 24,1992. The appellant was seventeen years *615old on the date of the offense. He was tried by a jury, which acquitted him of burglary and found him guilty of grand theft.

On June 7, 1993, the trial…