Legal Opinion

AETNA INC. v. MEDNAX, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 2019No. 2:18-cv-02217Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AETNA INC., ET AL : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, : : v. : : MEDNAX, INC. et al : NO. 18-cv-02217-WB Defendants. : MEMORANDUM CONCERNING DOC. NO. 101 Plaintiffs (collectively, “Aetna”) have filed a motion for a protective order seeking to quash subpoenas issued to various witnesses, among them counsel for Aetna and consultants engaged by counsel. Doc. No. 101 (“Pl. Mem.”). Defendants (collectively, “Mednax”) have responded and filed a cross-motion to compel responses to their subpoenas. Doc. No. 110 (“Def. Opp.”). Aetna…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Fmc Corporation, Douglas E. Kliever and Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. Grider v. Keystone Health Plan Central, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. R.C. Olmstead, Inc. v. CU Interface, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API