Legal Opinion · Dissent

New York World-Telegram Corp. v. McGoldrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 1947Published

1DissentVan Voorhis, J.

In order to classify a matter for the purposes of taxation or otherwise, the law looks at the substance and not merely at the form of the transaction. The application of this rule to the facts of this case, in my opinion, sustains the taxpayer’s position.

Petitioner, the New York World-Telegram Corporation, hereinafter described as the Publishing Company, has been assessed for the payment of $49,570.27, including interest and penalties, under the New York City sales tax law, based on *807alleged rentals paid to a now dissolved subsidiary for the use of its tangible personal property from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Central Union Gas Co. v. . BrowningNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Gardner v. Town of CameronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Gardner v. . Town of CameronNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Wilcox Bros. v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Jacob v. HaefelienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API