Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Mann

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1849PublishedCited by 9 opinions

from the Fourth District Court of New

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Rost, J.

This action was commenced by attachment, in August; 1847, on a. promissory note, which had been due more than five years at the time. The' plea of prescription, under art. 3505 of the Code, presents the only question in the cause. The plea was maintained in the first instance, and the plaintiff appealed.

In January; 1837, the defendant was' a member of the commercial' firm of W. L. # W. Mann, trading in Franklin, in the State of Mississippi. Flis brother and pftrther subscribed the note-sued on in the name of the firm, on the 6th January of…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Plaquemines Par. Com'n Council v. Delta Dev. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  3. Nathan v. CarterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  4. McClendon v. State, Through Dept. of CorrectionsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Aegis Insurance Co. v. Delta Fire & Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API