Legal Opinion
United States v. Nance
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 12, 2010No. 09-3786PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
Michael Nance pleaded guilty to receiving child pornography. At sentencing, he objected to the use of an earlier conviction in calculating his criminal history score. He also argued that the other child pornography he possessed at the time he received the images underlying his conviction was not relevant conduct for which he could receive offense-level enhancements. The district court overruled both objections and determined Nance’s advisory Guidelines range was 151-188 months based on a criminal history category of III and a total offense level of 32. After discussing…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Loren Samuel WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. AreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Ronald G. RitsemaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. VizcarraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. AhdersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Bruce JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.