Eichenbaum v. Loft Board

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur E. Blyn, J.

This article 78 petition seeks a judgment vacating the order of the respondent, New York City Loft Board, which declared that the premises located at 41 and 43 Bond Street, New York, New York, constituted a single horizontal multiple dwelling covered by the Loft Law (Multiple Dwelling Law, art 7-C, § 280 et seq.). Petitioner landlord contends that the premises constitute two separate buildings and that one of the buildings, 41 Bond Street, does not qualify for Loft Law coverage.

The motion by certain tenants at the premises for leave to intervene in this…