Legal Opinion
Krajci v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 28, 1981No. Civ. A. 79-2998PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
SHAPIRO, District Judge.
In this case tried to the court without a jury, the plaintiff borrowers contend that the defendant lender violated certain disclosure provisions of the Truth In Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. Plaintiffs seek to recover statutory damages, attorneys fees and costs under 15 U.S.C. § 1692K.
Plaintiffs, Leonard J. and Renee M. Krajci, and defendant, Provident Consumer Discount Co. (“Provident”), entered into a consumer loan transaction on August 16, 1978. In order to complete the transaction, plaintiffs executed several loan…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Anderson Bros. Ford v. ValenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Union National Bank v. LambSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- William Johnson and Joan Johnson, His Wife, and Cross-Appellees v. McCrackin Ford, Inc., and Ford Motor Credit Company, Inc., and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- John C. Pollock and Barbara Pollock v. General Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Romand v. ZimmermanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- Holden v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
- Armington v. School Dist. of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Richardson v. Diagnostic Rehabilitation CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Security Title & Guaranty Co. v. Day (In Re Day)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.