Legal Opinion

Hudlin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 4, 1931No. A-7668Published

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was jointly informed against with S. A. Clingan, charged with unlawfully, feloniously, and fraudulently uttering and passing a bogus check in the amount of f72.08; he was tried separately, convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $250, from which sentence and judgment the defendant has appealed.

The evidence, briefly stated, is that the defendant in this case and S. A. Clingan made an agreement that defendant would deposit in the bank $100 for Clingan to use in buying bogs and cattle, and tbe profit would be divided between tbe two. Tbe…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Crouse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Teague v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API