Legal Opinion

Akhavuz v. Moody

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 23, 2013No. 69234-8-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

¶1 At issue is an order vacating a default judgment almost a year after it was entered. The motion to vacate should have been denied because the insurer and defense counsel who failed to respond to the complaint offered no excuse for the long delay. There is no “innocent *529insured” doctrine that allows an insurer to escape responsibility by keeping its insured unaware that the matter is being neglected.

BACKGROUND

¶2 Studio Seven, a heavy metal nightclub in Seattle, held a party on Halloween night in 2010. Appellant Dana Akhavuz claims she attended the party at Studio Seven and slipped and fell…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. White v. HolmWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Morin v. BurrisWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Little v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Little v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ha v. Signal Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Crystal Soto v. Evan PavlicCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. In Re The Marriage Of Alaina Lynette Oster (kna Zender), Resp v. David William Oster, AppCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. In Re: Andrea Z. Jolles, And Mark P. CavenerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Jens Richter v. Allie Helinski, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API