Legal Opinion

DeNardo v. Barrans

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2002No. S-10292PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Daniel DeNardo filed a superior court action for damages arising out of his allegedly wrongful termination from state employment. The superior court dismissed his case, ruling that it was barred under the doctrine of res judicata by a prior judgment on a nearly identical federal claim, which the federal court had dismissed "with prejudice" under Federal Civil Rule 41(b) as a result of De-Nardo's wilifal refusal to comply with a calendaring order. The primary question on appeal is whether claim-preclusive effect attaches to the federal dismissal. Because…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Dupasseur v. RochereauSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Pennington v. SnowAlaska Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Five Star Capital Corp. v. RubyNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. DeNardo v. Calista Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Smith v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Stewart v. Virgin Islands Board of Land Use AppealsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  5. Brown v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API