Dobenspeck v. Armel
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Hamilton Court of Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
The complaint in this case contains two paragraphs. The first,' charges that the appellants, who were the defendants, are indebted to Armel 999 dollars for money by them had and received for his use. And the second, alleges that defendants, on the 5th of March, 1856, by the style of N. Dobenspeck, agreed to deliver, within twenty days thereafter, to the plaintiff, ait Ingraham’s distillery, at Mill Creek, near Cincinnati, Ohio, 600 sound and merchantable stock hogs, weighing from eighty pounds upwards ; for which plaintiff agreed to pay defendants 4 dollars and 50 cents per 100 pounds gross,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Dunham v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Merchants' Nat. Bank v. SevierUnited States Circuit Court · 1882
- Blair Baker Horse Co. v. Railroad Transfer Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915