United States v. Jorge Luis Alzate
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CARNES, Circuit Judge:
Jorge Luis Alzate was convicted of possessing and importing cocaine, and he has never denied doing it. At trial, his sole defense was duress. On two occasions while evidence was being presented, the prosecutor made certain representations detrimental to Alzate’s duress defense. Before the case was submitted to the jury, the prosecutor learned that his representations had been false, but he failed to correct them. Because the prosecutor’s failure to correct his false representations could have affected the jury’s verdict, we reverse the denial of Alzate’s new trial motion.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- United States v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Guzman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Kathleen A. Braun v. Barbara PowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Smith v. Secretary, Dept. of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel Antonio NORIEGA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.