Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stoler

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 5, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The only question raised by this bill of exceptians is, whether certain certificates purporting to be made by the assistant analyst of the department of public health were properly admitted in evidence to show the alcoholic content of liquor alleged to have been kept unlawfully and exposed for sale by the defendant with intent unlawfully to sell it.

There was evidence that a police officer, one Conroy, seized liquor on the defendant’s premises and delivered it to the sergeant, Curran, in charge of the liquor squad of his station; that Curran on the same day transmitted samples of the liquid to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SlavskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. BrelsfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  3. Commonwealth v. KendrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Commonwealth v. MageeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ernest Kay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  2. State v. HendersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. PreviteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. State v. HendersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API