Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Day

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 6, 1919No. 3273PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the District of Idaho; Frank S. Dietrich, Judge. Suit in equity by Mathilde Cardoner (Joseph R. Wilson, her executor, substituted as complainant) against Eugene R. Day and others and the Hercules Mining Company, a mining partnership. Decree for defendants (253 Fed. 572), and complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by Mathilde Cardoner from a decree of the District Court of Idaho, dismissing the complaint of plaintiff and refusing to cancel a certain deed of sale of mining property made by appellant October 28, 1916.

The appellees, except Harry R. Allen, Edward Boyce, and the Hercules Mining Company, are owners of undivided interests in the Hercules mine and other properties in Idaho and are conducting mining operations as the Hercules Mining Company under the laws of Idaho. The appellee Eugene R. Day since 1912 has been manag*789ing partner of the Hercules Company and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buckley v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Wheeler v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Moore v. LauffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walter v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Diamond v. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  3. Ohaco Sheep Co., Inc. v. Heirs of OhacoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Arkwright v. GonserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,344Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API