Legal Opinion

Hill v. White-Rodgers

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 29, 1984No. CA 83-318PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George K. Cracraft, Judge.

Tommy Hill appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Commission adopting the findings and conclusions of the administrative law judge that his injury was a scheduled one which could not be apportioned to the body as a whole and that therefore wage earning factors could not be considered in addition to the functional loss as provided in Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1313(c) (Repl. 1976). He argues that the Commission erred in refusing to consider additional evidence not presented to the administrative law judge but proffered by the appellant on his appeal. We find no…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hazen v. City of BoonevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Anchor Construction Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Cummings v. BoylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  4. W. Shanhouse & Sons, Inc. v. SimmsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. Mason v. LauckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Curry v. Franklin ElectricCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Couch v. First State BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Roberts-McNutt, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Whirlpool Corp. v. KaelinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Curry v. Franklin ElectricCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API