Legal Opinion

Robert E. Kennedy v. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 18, 2004No. 01-55246PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

379 F.3d 1041

Robert E. KENNEDY, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Bill LOCKYER, Attorney General, State of California, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-55246.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 5, 2003.

Filed June 14, 2004.

Amended August 18, 2004.

Jeff Dominic Price, Esq., Santa Monica, CA, for the appellant.

Lora Fox Martin and Anthony DaSilva, Deputy Attorney Generals, San Diego, CA, for the appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Barry Ted Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-02505-BTM.

Before REINHARDT,…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited102 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. (PC)Stevenson v. HollandDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. Lockyer, Attorney General of California v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API