Legal Opinion

Hays v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 17, 1914No. 5717Published

Indictment for compounding felony; from Chattooga superior court—Judge Wright. April 21, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, J.

1. Where one is charged with aiding and abetting in procuring the promise of another to compound a felony, and also with aiding and abetting another to compound a felony, by inducing such other person to enter into a written agreement never to appear as a witness against the party indicted for the felony, or suffer him to be tried for the offense named in the indictment, and no consideration is mentioned in the written agreement, the actual agreement may be inquired into.

2. A contract to suppress a criminal prosecution, for a consideration personal to the prosecutor, is immoral and contrary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deen v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Hays v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API