Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Moore

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the chancery court of Attala county. Hon. A. Y. Woodward, Chancellor. Bill by J. A. Armstrong and others against H. A. Moore. From a decree sustaining a demurrer and granting sixty days to amend, complainant appeals. On motion to dismiss appeal. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

Appellants, as complainants in the court below, exhibited their hill of complaint against appellee in the chancery court of Attala county. Their hill was met by demurrer, which, upon consideration, was by the chancellor sustained. The court in sustaining the demurrer granted the complainants sixty days in which to amend the bill. The order of court is as follows;

“Came on this day to be heard the above-styled cause of J. A. Armstrong et al. v. H. A. Moore et al., on *512original bill filed and demurrer thereto, and the court after hearing said demurrer to said -bill, hereby sustains the same, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Board of Supervisors v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Harvey v. ClarkMississippi Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carothers v. Bank of BaldwynMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Slater v. BishopMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Turner v. CarterMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  4. McGill v. City of LaurelMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  5. McGill v. City of LaurelMississippi Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API