Legal Opinion
Romero v. Romero
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1924No. 2844PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT.
PARKER, C. J.
The appellee, hereinafter called plaintiff, entered into a written contract of lease of a certain number of sheep with Andres A. Romero, Jr., and the sheep were delivered to him and he entered upon the performance of the contract. The contract provided for the delivery of a bond of indemnity to plaintiff securing her against loss by reason of the failure to perform the contract. The bond was given, and one Boleslo Romero became surety on the same. The lessee became financially embarrassed and refused to further perform the contract. Plaintiff applied to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Spokane Falls v. CurryWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Radcliffe v. ChavesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1910
- Bujac v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- Heisch v. J. L. Bell & Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1902
- Ramsey v. Perth Amboy Shipbuilding & Engineering Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tipton v. ClowerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Security State Bank v. Clovis Mill & Elevator Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- City of Tulsa v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Young v. Southern Pac. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
- Smith v. Maljamar Oil & Gas Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1930