Legal Opinion

Ingersoll v. Kansas State Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1921No. 23,435PublishedCited by 4 opinions

OPINION ON REHEARING. Appeal from Saline district court; Dallas Grover, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

An opinion in this action was filed July 9, 1921, and is found in 109 Kan. 5341 A rehearing was granted, and the cause has been rebriefed and reargued.

*1231. In addition to the statement of facts found in the former opinion, it is proper to state that the Kansas State Bank was incorporated and that the evidence did not show that the bank received any consideration or realized anything out of either transaction. That opinion was based on the construction given to section 556 of the General Statutes of 1915. That section does not confer authority…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. El Capitan Land & Cattle Co. v. Boston-Kansas City Cattle Loan Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Long Bros. v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Express Co. v. Citizens State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Bridge v. Welda State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Hutchinson Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Hudson State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Mendell v. Union State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API