Legal Opinion
Morris B. Chapman & Associates v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided March 18, 1996No. 7:CV95-3170Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CAMBRIDGE, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Piester’s Report and Recommendation (filing 17). No objections to such report and recommendation have been filed as allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and NELR 72.4.
The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and NELR 72.4 and finds after de novo review that the report and recommendation should be adopted. As a result, Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction will be denied. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Lfc Lessors, Inc. v. Pacific Sewer Maintenance Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Simon Zunamon v. W. G. Brown, J. P. Brown, Sr., and J. E. (Doc) BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Michael Larkin v. Thomas BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Susan R. Lindsey v. M.A. Zeccola & Sons, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation M.A. ZeccolaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.