Legal Opinion
State v. Hanson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1996No. Criminal 960103PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
The State has appealed a district court order declaring § 29-91-32, N.D.C.C., unconstitutional and limiting discovery in its criminal prosecution of Dale Clayton Hanson. We affirm.
Hanson was charged with driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Hanson’s attorney requested discovery of 1) documents, tangible objects, and reports of examinations and tests, under Rule 16(a)(1)(C) and (D), N.D.R.Crim.P.; and 2) the names of prosecution witnesses and statements made by them, under Rule 16(f)(1), N.D.R.Crim.P. Upon compliance with Hanson’s discovery request, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arneson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- McAvoy v. H B Sherman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. VetschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Glaspell v. City of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- City of Carrington v. Foster CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Tormaschy v. TormaschyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Traynor v. LeclercNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Peterson v. North Dakota University SystemNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.