Legal Opinion

Lockwood v. Lockwood

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 15, 1905Published

Before Purdy, J., Beaufort, January, 1904. Application by Laura M. Lockwood, in Lockwood v. Lockwood, for order requiring master toi pay balance proceeds of sale to her. From order continuing- motion, movant appeals. cites:. Costs due master: Code of 1902, 3097, 3113; 16 S. C., 362; 53 S. C., 387. cites : No appeal lies from order of continuance: 42 S. C., 205; 33 S. C., 333.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

The plaintiff, as executrix of the will of William H. Lockwood, deceased, brought this action for the purpose of marshaling the assets of the estate of said deceased, calling in creditors, and winding up said estate under the direction of'the Court. Judge Townsend referred the cause to the master of Beaufort County to take proof of claims against said estate and report the same to the Court, requiring creditors to establish their claims in this action and restraining them from otherwise enforcing their claims. Under this order, it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hecht & Co. v. FrieslebenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888
  2. Cooke v. PooleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API