Legal Opinion

Knapp v. Byram

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 22, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs brought these actions respectively in the state district court under the provisions of the federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 USCA §§ 51-59 [Comp. St. §§ 8657-8665]). That act was originally passed in 1908 (35 Stat. 65, e. 149).

Except for an abortive act passed in 1906 (34 Stat. 232), this act of 1908 was new legislation. Prior thereto, federal legislation had not entered or occupied this field.

Section 7 of the Act of 1908 (45 USCA § 57 [Comp. St. § 8663]) provides as follows:

“That the term ‘common carrier’ as used in this act shall include the receiver or receivers or other…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ruff v. GayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  2. Elliott v. WheelockDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1929
  3. California v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API