Legal Opinion

Elliott v. United States

District Court, D. Maine

Decided November 16, 1926No. 36PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, District Judge.

The petitioner, a resident of Thomaston, Me., brings this petition under the Tucker Act (24 Stat. 505), authorizing him to sue the United States to recover back income taxes paid in 1919 for 1918, and in 1920 for 1919, upon his shares in three wooden vessels, namely V64 of the schooner Margaret Throop, of 1,800 tons dead weight capacity, V«4 of the barkentine Cecil P. Stewart, of 1,800 tons, */64 of the barkentine Reine Marie Stewart, of-2,000 tons. He claims amortization upon each of these ships under section 214, subd. a (9) of the Revenue Act of 1918, passed by…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1943
  2. United States v. Briggs Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  4. (PC) Carroll v. CovelloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (PC) Dunn v. RodriguezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API