Legal Opinion
NCLN20, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 4, 2008No. 02-1282CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BRADEN, Judge.
On October 26, 2007, the defendant (“Government”) filed a Motion For Partial Dismissal, asserting that the Third and Fourth Claims of NCLN20, Inc. (“NCLN20” or “Plaintiff’)’s September 27, 2007 Amended Complaint should be dismissed, because they were not submitted to the contracting officer (“CO”), as required by the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 605(a)-(c). For the reasons discussed herein, the Government’s Motion For Partial Dismissal is denied.
In order to facilitate review of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, the following outline is…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- NCLN20, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016