Legal Opinion

Contreras v. United States

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided February 23, 2022No. 4:17-cv-04075Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION MARIO M. CONTRERAS, 4:17-CV-04075-LLP Movant, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ‘Pending before the Court is Movant, Mario Contreras’s (“Contreras”) “Response to the Government” in regard to his Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Civ. Doc. 208.) The government filed a Reply asserting that Contreras’s Response raises three new claims that are untimely and that do not relate back to his Amended § 2255 Petition. (Doc. 210 at 1.) Contreras…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. United States v. Michael Lloyd CraycraftCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. Ciampi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  4. John A. Mandacina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. Dodd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API