Legal Opinion
Eugen Georgescu v. Bechtel Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 25, 1994No. 93-15424Published
1Opinion of the Court
15 F.3d 1085
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Eugen GEORGESCU, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BECHTEL CONSTRUCTION, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-15424.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 18, 1994.*
Decided Jan. 25, 1994.
Before: REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM**
2
Eugen Georgescu appeals pro se the district court's…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aurelia SCHOLAR, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. PACIFIC BELL, a Pacific Telesis Company, a Corporation, Defendant/AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ruby Humphreys, Administratrix of the Estate of William Orvie Humphreys, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. State of California and California State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Nickolas John Andrade v. United States Sentencing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993