Legal Opinion · Dissent

Indiana Board of Beauty Culturist Examiners v. Royal Beauty Academy of Washington

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1968No. 20,722Published

1Dissent

*180Dissenting Opinion

Bierly, J.

— I respectfully dissent to the majority opinion in the case at bar.

Burns’ 63-1824a provides as follows:

“The administrative adjudication act, the same being Chapter 65 of the Acts of 1947, shall not apply to the board or its action or inaction. This section is enacted for the purposes of clarification.”.This section went into eifect on August 1, 1955.

It is my opinion that this section specifically exempts any action, of which the Board is a party, from the application of the Administrative Adjudication Act.

Provision had already been made by the Legislature for the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Northwestern Indiana Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State Board of Medical Registration & Examination v. SchererIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Stone v. FrittsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Spurgeon v. RhodesIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API