Legal Opinion

United States v. Harold E. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1977No. 76-3327Published

1Opinion of the Court

555 F.2d 249

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Harold E. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 76-3327.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

June 8, 1977.

Thomas M. Schneiger, Federal Defender Section, Metropolitan Public Defender, Portland, Or., argued, for defendant-appellant.

Marc D. Blackman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., argued for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.

Before MERRILL and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and BLUMENFELD,* District Judge.

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

1

Appellant Harold E. Smith was found guilty of criminal…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API