Legal Opinion

In Re the Accounting of Klenk

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1915PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 13,1914, which reversed a decree of the Queens County Surrogate’s Court settling the account of Fritz Klenk, as administrator of the estate of Marie Klenk, deceased.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 13,1914, which reversed a decree of the Queens County Surrogate’s Court settling the account of Fritz Klenk, as administrator of the estate of Marie Klenk, deceased. The question presented concerns the ownership of two bank deposits standing in the name of the decedent, one in the Corn Exchange Bank of Long Island City, the other in the German Savings Bank of New York; also, of a promissory note made to the decedent by the brother of the administrator. The surrogate found as…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Werner, Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Miller and Cardozo. JJ.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of FilfileyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
  2. Matter of Neglia v. . ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Commrade v. CommradeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Bruff v. Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Bruff v. Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API