Legal Opinion

Edmund J. Garstkiewicz v. United States Postal Service

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 8, 1992No. 92-3083PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Edmund J. Garstkiewicz appeals the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board denying his petition for attorney fees incurred in connection with an enforcement proceeding. 1 We reverse the Board’s decision.

Background

Following an action brought by Mr. Garstkiewicz before the Merit Systems Protection Board, by Order dated May 4, 1990 the United States Postal Service was directed to cancel Mr. Garstkiewicz’s demotion and to pay an appropriate amount of back pay with interest, no later than sixty calendar days after May 4, in accordance with the following terms:

We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Brenda Bennett v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Gerald L. Naekel v. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Mary K. Olsen v. Department of Commerce, Census BureauCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Michael T. Cuthbertson v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kevin Gray v. Department of Defense, Merit Systems Protection Board2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API