National Development Co. v. Lawson-Porter Shoe Machinery Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, District Judge.
The plaintiff seeks an injunction and an accounting growing out of an alleged infringement of its patent No. 1,829,800. The defendant denies the validity of the patent unless its claims are so limited, in view of the prior art, that the defendant’s apparatus does not come within the scope of the claims, and further denies infringement. A supplemental bill filed by the plaintiff has been disposed of by consent. The claims in suit are numbered 1, 2, 3, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, and 30.
Findings of Fact.
Title to the patent is conceded to be in the plaintiff. It covers an edge…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Wachs v. BalsamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Mathey v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1940
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Development Co. v. Lawson-Porter Shoe Machinery Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942